Tiz tru dat moi preferz 'z 88 muzic, generally zpeakin
Howevah
Fo attendin a rectal
If y’azk me if I’d ratha go to da DOC playin or da PUNANI playin ,
I’d prefur da forma
So,
Can’t really answa yo poll, it dependz
I would rather attend an all-Alkan recital - but really only for the rarity and opportunity of it. As much as I love Alkan I do think Schumann was the better composer. Or, at least, that he wrote more good music than Alkan did.
Alkan is very “special” though. He’s sharp, bizarre, ravenous, ironic, prone to extremes, and with little regard for etiquette and politeness. At this point I don’t think it’s that his music isn’t known or even respected, but that many - pianists and audiences alike - have difficulties coming to terms with him.
but da queztion iz about hafin enough ‘great’ muzik to fill a programme
and both do
take da bezt 90 minz ov da KAN vz da bezt 90 minz ov da ZHOE and I think dere iznt much quality difference
da ZHOE iz a mo ‘poetic’ compoza but da KAN iz very moving in hiz own way, da climaxez in Alkan are often zo ferociouz and cathartic dat dey feel lyk an exorcizm
Yes, depends on pianist of course, but with all things equal definitely Alkan. If they had been similarly popular and performed however, I’m not so sure anymore. Probably Schumann.
An interesting observation is that despite da Doc’s work om behalf of da KAN, as far as da Meph can see no big name pianist after him has ever played da KAN’s music. Is that tru? Da Favorin is a good pianist, but not really that well known.
No I really think it is as per above. I don’t think Alkan will ever be a mainstream name. There was Busoni, then there was Petri, then Lewenthal, then almost Cziffra, then Hamelin and in due time there will be someone else - but this is how it will continue.
It’s not that he’s unknown or that people are puzziez, it’s simply his personality.