I’m rarely a fan of Trifonov, but I went into this with an open mind and DAMN is this some uninspired playing. Same goes for the others he played at this concert, though this was the worst of them. I love the Shostakovich Op. 87 P&Fs and I was hoping Trifonov would do great things with them. He did not.
Every time I’m about to bash this guy I’m reminded of the few really good things he’s done. I think he’s an awful pianist, an ordinary musician, and a weak artist - and yet in the middle of that there’s unquestionably the spark of genius.
I wouldn’t use the word “awful” to describe his playing.
In this day and age - the huge rep that he is able to unleash - is a big plus. So what if the quality isn’t Golden Age.
I have yet to find an awful pianist who plays all the Rach Concerti, Prick 1, 2, 3, complete Chopin and Liszt Etudes and also wrote a fucking piano concerto.
If I had to pick his best recs:
Chopin 24 Preludes, Pimpson from Carnigga.
Rach Corelli, Chopin Vars, Concerto 1
Liszt Etudes (da harder ones are a bit pussy but still an epic set. He learned it in one summer - what a mofo)
I don’t think I’d describe any pianist who can actually play the piano as awful.
It’s like this winemaker told me once, you can say you like a wine or not but not that it’s good or bad (unless it’s turned to vinegar). Having said that, I have yet to hear one recording from Trifonov which made me sit up and take notice.
I like Grosvenor better, he also isn’t as hyped as Trifonov.
I see your point though.
They’re all still so young we have to give them time.
I still have (some) hopes for LL, but he seems to be going the Liberace route.
When he behaves himself, he’s good. But, he’s already developed a liking for stretching the music completely out of shape. As such, I won’t bother with him again, unless I hear evidence that he’s changed.