Da RECTUM iz lyk a mofo drivin a FERRARI down a ztraight lyn pedal to da floor
Da ZIFF lyk a mofo ridin thro an azzault courze on a motabyke in da middle ov north zentinel izland wiz random nativez throwin arrowz at hiz azz n da CODA iz where he hop on a zpeedboat n get d a fuck outta dodge
Whoa. Allright metronomic playing is never good, but there’s a clear difference between that and having an innate sense of rhythm in your playing. It is that I think is almost universally found in “great” pianists. It has nothing to do with being metronomic or lacking in freedom - Rachmaninoff indeed, but even someone like Cherkassky was kosher to the point of pedanticism when it came to these basic musical principles.
Pulse, too. There I wouldn’t take the venerable Shura as example perhaps, but if you listen to Richter play Beethoven you almost can’t keep yourself from stomping along with the foot sometimes. There’s nothing “metronomic” or dry about it, but it’s strong, tightly kept and done in a marked, almost dancing manner.
Pulse+rhythm=life. It can have dramatic effects in hall on its own as well. One of my most memorable concert experiences was hearing Sokolov play the 3rd Schubert MM in 2015. There was nothing wild about the playing, but suddenly having that marked and, in his hands, unrelenting rhythm after the sedative 2nd MM was a near hallucinogenic experience where it seemed as if the whole hall came alive and danced with him.
In the piece da ZEPP pozted firzt - metronomic workz bezt
Metronomic simply means minimal ‘warping’ - and it includes accenting beats and outlining phrases musically
When I said balance between Warping and Metronomic - I meant that during most beats there is an even tempo - but just as there is dynamics in terms of loud and soft - rubato can be seen as dynamic also.
Just as a passage can be marked Forte - it doesn’t mean play every note the same volume, it’s just a general idea, and there should be the same approach taken with rhythmic dynamics.
Structure should be maintained but not at the expense of the natural breathing-rubato that flows with a passage - and vice versa.
Yeah, I’m sensitive to that word after an ill advised Liszt scholar tried to make the case that Liszt was a crap pianist, (mis-)quoting a review to make it appear as if Liszt’s playing was metronomic as part of his “evidence”.
Metronomic is a word I’d only use negatively, since it implies playing mechanically, while the ability to keep a firm pulse and correct rhythm are only positive traits.
That being said, some pianists could learn a thing or two from Maestro Midi.
My favourite performances of some lesser played pieces to this day are still Midis, because despite their mechanical nature - sometimes an unerring pulse and tempo are better assets than human subtlety.
TRU!! da ztrong/weak beat accent tech iz mo important den keepin ztrict tym
da , much lyk da , alzo had a uniquely fucked gensui rhythmic zenze. if u compare hiz ztarz ztrippah zheeyat wiz modern mofoz who prax wiz a metronome, u vil c da HO dun really play in tym, but zound mo MOFO regardlezz