It haf already been eztablizhed argued dat da BACH iz legendary fo diz
It zeem dat da zame can be applied fo any pre-romantic piecez becuz dey don’t depend upon da pedal az much
Bezidez BACH - which piecez n rep wud u zuggezt to improve clarity cuntrol n bazically - freedom from da Pedal coverin up any dizcrepenciez
Chop Mazks? Phrasing is important there, which sometimes means you can’t use the pedal as much as the harmonies allow.
Tru! Off da top ov yo head which pozt-clazzical rep do u noe datz bazically purely-crizp n pedal free?
The Prok Scherzo?
¯_(ツ)/¯ ¯(ツ)/¯ ¯(ツ)/¯ ¯(ツ)_/¯
DIZ particula et very rape-proof n demandz pure clarity
Not pedal free rep but great workz for dizplayin crizpnezz
Diz da moz rape-proof KAN piece
It comes down to decisions really, even in Bacchus.
Right, yeah da COMME too would be a mess with pedal. In post-classical I can primarily think of these fast, rhythmical pieces which would be blurred by the pedal - but even there you typically want to dip it every now and then for colour.
Da Zcar zelexion of Zonataz foh developing crizpnezz in ardickulation
Which pozt-baroque n pozt-clazzical piecez can be uzed fo deze purpozez or iz it impozz to achieve da zame rezultz wizout playin da oldzkool rep?
Hafin zaid dat I wud ratha play Baroque workz den da Zhozty prelz n fuguez
I’d say some workz of da French compozahz. Da French School in general known for itz crizpnezz n clarité with sumtimez zparze uze of da r. pedal. Take a work like diz: