da ANTI-SD

Ashley_Tervort · February 2, 2009, 2:13pm

k-nar · February 2, 2009, 2:32pm

HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAHAHAHA

Thracozaag · February 2, 2009, 2:43pm

“very moosical”

Brewtality · February 2, 2009, 2:57pm

unleash da bomb squad on him

hhaha man this guy iz pretentious

I am “BachScholar” because in 1992 I experienced a truly cosmic and life-changing revelation that allowed me to “break the Bach tempo code” and determine the precise tempos Bach planned for virtually all his music. I discovered that Bach followed a secret formula of “duration ratios” comprised exclusively of the numbers 1, 2, and 3. For example, a prelude and fugue may both last two minutes (1:1 ratio), 1:30-3:00 (1:2 ratio), or 2:40-4:00 (2:3 ratio). Careful study and analysis shows Bach followed this formula in at least 99% of his works.

In sum, Bach planned the style, time signature, and tempo first, which enabled him to calculate the number of measures for which to aim (to achieve a certain duration) when finally putting pen to paper. In other words, Bach had a precise tempo in mind for virtually every movement even before he physically composed it! This is analogous to an architect planning the dimensions of rooms before having them built. In essence, Bach was the “architect” and we the performers are the “carpenters” whose job it is to faithfully follow Bach’s plans or “blueprints”. Please visit my website for more on this important and fascinating topic!

I love the leader

coqdorysme · February 2, 2009, 3:59pm

Brewtality:

unleash da bomb squad on him

hhaha man this guy iz pretentious

I am “BachScholar” because in 1992 I experienced a truly cosmic and life-changing revelation that allowed me to “break the Bach tempo code” and determine the precise tempos Bach planned for virtually all his music. I discovered that Bach followed a secret formula of “duration ratios” comprised exclusively of the numbers 1, 2, and 3. For example, a prelude and fugue may both last two minutes (1:1 ratio), 1:30-3:00 (1:2 ratio), or 2:40-4:00 (2:3 ratio). Careful study and analysis shows Bach followed this formula in at least 99% of his works.

In sum, Bach planned the style, time signature, and tempo first, which enabled him to calculate the number of measures for which to aim (to achieve a certain duration) when finally putting pen to paper. In other words, Bach had a precise tempo in mind for virtually every movement even before he physically composed it! This is analogous to an architect planning the dimensions of rooms before having them built. In essence, Bach was the “architect” and we the performers are the “carpenters” whose job it is to faithfully follow Bach’s plans or “blueprints”. Please visit my website for more on this important and fascinating topic!

I love the leader

THIS IS LIKE TIMECUBE. www.timecube.com

and it is so slow my grandma playz faster

musicsdarkangel · February 3, 2009, 2:47am

hahahaha la campanella

“Too fast!”

REALLY?

Ashley_Tervort · February 3, 2009, 3:07am

[quote
Please enjoy this exciting work as you have probably never heard it before! At the very least, this performance intends to prove that “faster” does not always mean “better”. Unfortunately, this “faster is better” mentality is very pervasive especially among YouTubers.

Can’t we just outgrow this childish philosophy and get to the essence of the music instead of trying to show off to everyone how fast we can play?[/quote]

mannnnn

musicsdarkangel · February 3, 2009, 3:24am

“I prefer butthole pleasures”.

iamcanadian · February 3, 2009, 3:32am

Wow, pretty elaborate explanation for his slow and boring playing.

Random aside: I think T-Judd’s La Camp is the greatest ever.

SteinwayModelD · February 3, 2009, 4:33am

Ginzburg fo moi

jredmond · February 3, 2009, 4:34am

i’m just bored by the piece in general

Brewtality · February 3, 2009, 5:11am

concurred, although if I had to listen to it I’d go with Hofmann.

coqdorysme · February 3, 2009, 1:11pm

bolet for me - i like the one on his decca rec, it has some subtle changes in it around that add some variation.

Da_Nor · February 9, 2009, 8:10pm

painful interpretation couldnt watch entirely

subwoofah · February 10, 2009, 1:59am

Friedman and Hofmann.

vladhorwz · February 10, 2009, 4:56am

This is almost as bad as Paderewski’s

Da_Nor · February 16, 2009, 3:08am

the most WTF part is the begin when he asks to “PLEASE WATCH IN HIGH QUALITY”

Catz · February 17, 2009, 3:49am

Brewtality:

unleash da bomb squad on him

hhaha man this guy iz pretentious

I am “BachScholar” because in 1992 I experienced a truly cosmic and life-changing revelation that allowed me to “break the Bach tempo code” and determine the precise tempos Bach planned for virtually all his music. I discovered that Bach followed a secret formula of “duration ratios” comprised exclusively of the numbers 1, 2, and 3. For example, a prelude and fugue may both last two minutes (1:1 ratio), 1:30-3:00 (1:2 ratio), or 2:40-4:00 (2:3 ratio). Careful study and analysis shows Bach followed this formula in at least 99% of his works.

In sum, Bach planned the style, time signature, and tempo first, which enabled him to calculate the number of measures for which to aim (to achieve a certain duration) when finally putting pen to paper. In other words, Bach had a precise tempo in mind for virtually every movement even before he physically composed it! This is analogous to an architect planning the dimensions of rooms before having them built. In essence, Bach was the “architect” and we the performers are the “carpenters” whose job it is to faithfully follow Bach’s plans or “blueprints”. Please visit my website for more on this important and fascinating topic!

I love the leader

hahah tranzlation:

I have developed a convoluted mode of reasoning which only insane people have thought of before. Hence it is not only true but it makes me sophisticated.

GriM · June 14, 2009, 3:53pm

JOHN RUSNAK IS BAKKKKKK

k-nar · June 14, 2009, 4:57pm

hahaha he lookz n zoundz lyk da simpsonz comic book guy