Goldbergz vz Diabelli

Dizagree dat da WTC iz academic, da fuguez maybe but da prelz are very emotive and immediate

Da BBC production back in 2000 had me hooked, wiuz da 4 peniztz includin da :gav:

Allright but if you compare it to Vivaldi, Scarlatti, or things like Bachā€™s G major concerto?

I mean it IS academic music. They were written as study pieces and examples in composition, not for public performance.

1 Like

U iz technically correct BUT workz dat were fo public performance Bach den were fo only a few perfz n datz why he cumpozed zo much nu zheeyat fo da novelty

He didnā€™t cunzidah how inzanely legendary hiz legacy wud be and how often dey wud be played

tru

Perahia had a good Goldberg set in good sound. This moist theme is a no go for the no pedal Bach Dudes for me.

da bezt goldburgahz iz da WHALE live

for reazonz unknown to me, people think I iz ironical when I zay diz
zo EXCEPTIONALLY and to avoid all confuzion I will not ztart diz pozt by ā€œhahahaā€ n finizh it with ā€œ:sunglasses:ā€

diz iz in mah top 5 88 rec of all tym

4 Likes

Daim da excluzion ov da :whale: icon meanz diz iz zeriouz zheeyat :sunglasses:

Da MART az much an inzanely inexplicable fanboy ov da WHALE az da Comme iz ov da HUFF :sunglasses:

1 Like

How odd :dong:

So how do you like the Diabellis from the same concert? I remember the program, it came from way out of left field.

Whut would I do fo a FEINBERG Goldberg

Not sure if he even had it in his rep tho

HAHAHAHAH!!!

da MART feel a zpecial noztalgik cuntnexion to diz perf only becuz

he boned da WHALETTE at da back of da hall durin da perf :sunglasses:

Link to perf.?

Kovacevich has a classic rec of the diabellis if I zheeyat correctly.
I think i have more recs of the goldburgahs than anything else yet I rarely listen to bach. Still have problems connecting with a lot of his keyboard zheeyats.

I donā€™ care much about da DIABLOZ

for my rezearchez I iz organizing a fair musicality duel between da WHALE and ur fav penizt : da SOCK
both live zide by zide
I think tiz interezting cuz it showz da 2 oppozite approach of penizm

  • da SOCK approach : dizzecting da text with magnifyin glazz
  • da WHALE approach : BIG PICTURE

alzo I think da whale iz zuperior in all m*zicallity dimenzion : RHTHM, PHRAZING, TENZION ENGAGEMENT, COLOR

angryly dizcuzz :lib:

EXCERPT 1
SOCK

WHALE

EXCERPT 2
SOCK

WHALE

EXCERPT 3
SOCK

WHALE

EXCERPT 4
SOCK

WHALE

4 Likes

Haha Iā€™m honored

While Sokolov certainly is one of my favourite pianists, as I mentioned above I really donā€™t care for this recording however (or anything really he did at the time). Iā€™d like him to revisit it now 40 years later.

Iz da Whale playing with clazzical tuning or zum zheeyat? Zoundz lower.

HAHAHAHA!!!

da rezt wuz incuntcluzive but

da zepp opinion finally perzuaded by da excerpt 4 :sunglasses:

Still prefer Sok.

If youā€™ve never tried Bach/Busoni Goldbergs give it a shot. Donā€™t agree with everything in it, but itā€™s richly rewarding. Now whenever I hear the original I find myself missing some of the Busoni modifications.

2 Likes

I misread your post and thought you wrote ā€œStill prefer Spockā€

The most logical Goldbergs ever.

I still like Perahia better than both. He plays it like a flowing river with limited hair tossing banjo moments. How this mr Goldberg gonna chill and sleep with all this Sock racket?

A river flows in him tru!