This broadcast preserved you guys think?
1 Like
Ok answered my question refers to the e minor concerto fragment still kinda cool though…
1 Like
Yeah something like that. Or the 1936 Buenos Aires broadcast recital, apparently lost in a fire. I heard from Francis Crociata that there’s still a very small chance some broadcast from Ford Sunday Evening Hour of January 24, 1937 could show up. The treasure there would be the Pimp HR 12.
2 Likes
Luckily another broadcast of the whole mofo exists.
1938 wiz Barbirolli
2 Likes
Check out this british archive of this perf. A record of it preserved by Godowsky’s son. Wonder if that’s the Marston source or if different.
http://cadensa.bl.uk/uhtbin/cgisirsi/?ps=3uX9qBi6Rs/WORKS-FILE/45950033/9
Hah! So that rec was made for Godowsky?
It’s similar today actually, the recs I make also go to several top tier pianists who want to snoop on the competition (not always with my enthusiastic approval I might add).
1 Like
Hehe yes damn, this almost got me excited for a while there. But it’s a mislabeling alas - they mean 1938-04-04 (the Golden Jubilee Concert).
Shoot! Does anybody have Horowitz recording matrix logs from European Recordings - especially lost Brahms pag stuff…? May as well check the unlabeled test pressings they have there for kicks.
Remember used to be in the book which I lost : (
Yes… Though I’d need a day to find them!
1 Like
(they’re photocopies, in a binder or pile of paper)
I found the matrices in the Horowitz group. Possible good news… I think from patterns the CB/DB are being used interchangeably in other pressings matrix prefixes…
Maybe found the lost Brahms Pag side???
Ah, no. DB 7210 there is a catalogue number, which was only assigned for mastered pressings when they went on sale as a commercial product. The numbers you see in the logs there are the matrix numbers, which helped the labels keep track of their recording activity. The VH Brahms/Pag would have a matrix number since it was recorded, but it would not have a catalogue number since it wasn’t released.
(the C, 2B, RC etc in the matrix numbers also aren’t used interchangeably, but encodes something about the recording - the process, disc type, etc)
Got it, double shoot : (
The optimist in me is hoping for a mislabeled entry. Data is pretty sparse for commercial rec in their fastidious catalogue. Is super long shot, but firing them an email to see what I can find out about this mysterious entry. I’ll keep you posted…
1 Like