A ton of stuff! I think he was worthwhile in almost everything he played. Sound production has just become more and more important for me in piano and there are few who succeed with me without it, but ABM is most definitely one.
It’s funny, I think that was the first version of the piece I ever heard, but where it was one the interpretation that would play in my mind whenever I would hear a new version, now it sounds “different”. I think I need to reacquaint myself with Michelangeli. Once again, I had most of my ABM material on CDs which I never ripped.
The Chopin recital on DG is some of the most hypnotic playing of Chopin ever. His Faschingsshwank aus Wien from a Live Recital in Tokyo in 1973 is outstanding, as is the entire recital.
I love his tone. He’s has a very penetrating sound and so many gradations of volume. The way he layers sound in Debussy is phenomenal.
Every Schumann piece he played (yes, including the debated 1975 Carnaval on EMI)
the 2 cd set on Testament with his BBC recital and the 30 minutes rehearsal
The Schumann concerto with Mitropulos has been, for years, the only version of the piece I could listen to (before going into it, I found that Concerto boring and repetitive).
Apart from the celebrated Rachmaninov-Ravel, I like much less his other concerto recordings (Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven with Giulini).
That is definitely one of the bigger bones versions I’ve heard. I played it for Andsnes (and shat myself int he process), we had totally different views. He seemed to take the bold, Brahmsian approach as well.
I forgot to add this to my list.
According to the well known anecdote, Cortot said “a new Liszt is born” when he heard Michelangeli play this Concerto.
The Liszt Concerto with Ansermet was very interesting, considering the young age of the soloist. But I mention the Emperor with Rossi in 1947 and the 1966 versions with Steinberg and Previn. I try to find out the versions of the Op.73 with Caracciolo in 1965/66 and Horvat in 1971.