That’s the question that Hamelin should have asked himself before performing one of the most embarassing accounts of the Chopin B minor for a DVD release…but seriously, I believe that Chopin is actually quite an important composer whose works deserve to be interpreted by a new generation of pianists.
Gimme a break. You derided me a few months ago for almost always preferring Rachmaninoff, Moiseiwitsch, Friedman, Barere etc. to more recent pianists.
And nowhere did I suggest that Blechacz’s recording is in anyway close to the best versions (i.e., Moiseiwitsch)…I just said he was an artist worthy of our support.
Yeesh. Complain about popular disinterest in this type of music, then mock the idea of supporting one of the better pianists. Hypocrisy.
And yeah, Goerner is one of the outstanding ones too. But this topic isn’t about Goerner.
Well there’s our problem… ‘One of the better pianists’
I don’t see it that way.
That’s my point. Or my hypocrisy or whatever you want to call it. Go ahead and use all the big words you want, that doesn’t change my opinion of this ‘competition’ pianist who has never ever gone outside of his comfort zone and probably never will.
BORING and not worth my time. But go ahead and enjoy the party, I don’t care what you like or don’t like.
Really? In general I find that the latest generation of players don’t really have substantial ideas at all. I get the impression that most “musical” gestures or interpretive ideas are either terribly naive, learned from hundreds of other middle-of-the-road performances (Kobrin etc), or sound like their teacher told them to do it so they do it like a good little student (Kissin)
i guess personally i would prefer crazy ideas to no ideas. that’s one of the reasons i still listen to pogo… although sometimes it’s really just like a sick car crash that you drive by and you can’t help looking