Maybe different regulations for how the monetization works, or different distribution deals/opportunities?
These vids are rarely playable for me either, but the Zadora one Mikhail linked to was.
Indeed, pozz - countries where sales are guuudā¦ no YT. 
Countries where sales are poorā¦ YT. 
1 Like
I would speculate that the content owner can specify in which countries to make the content available. That facility is certainly there for some forms of online distribution.
1 Like
Yeah, from like 6 playbacks a year.
Everyone else is typing in āRamen hackā, āHow to tuckā and āhomemade fleshlight on a budgetā into da YouTube search engine.
I mean seriously, how many mofos are 
enough to search fo Michael Von Zadora on da tube 
Michael von Zadora, Ignaz Friedman or even Rachmaninoff himself playing da 2nd concerto canāt compete with
3.2 million views btw.
No but I hate youtube for 78-rpms. Just a single track before YT wanders off to someplace else, and sometimes itās even interrupted by a commercial half way through! Iād rather take it from spotify then if I had used it, or simply CD/FLACs.
1 Like
I doubt streaming will be the future for small labels of classical music. Musicians and small/independent labels of pop music have been complaining that they cannot make money with Spotify streams. A report in 2015 said that Spotify on average paid per stream to rights holders lands somewhere between $0.006 and $0.0084. It is hard to imagine how many can labels like APR earn by allowing their albums to be streamed.
In my experience Spotify typically pays about $5 per 1k streams, ie $0.005 per stream.
1 Like
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2579942?hl=en
āYouTube algorithmically determines the central topics in a video and then uses that information to develop collections of videos for any topic of interest. These channels donāt convey any editorial opinion on the part of YouTube.ā
Notice that for example in the Michael Zadora ātopicā, they also added a video that came from my channel. Of course I took the audio from the APR release. 
1 Like
Itās really a bit WTF. How many tracks does an average user stream per month? 100? Whatās the monthly subscription fee? $10? Unless those numbers are off the charts wrong each subscriber pays around $0.1 per stream, which in that case means a mere 5% of the earnings goes to the label.
Thereās also free Spotify, which I use occasionally, and Iāve not seen any drawbacks other than ads.
1 Like
There must be something wrong. If they pay $5 per 1k stream that means even a huge record company with 1M streams per month through spotify alone would earn $5k per month - from their entire catalogue! If that had been the economy behind it there wouldnāt be a single label on spotify, I mean itās the monthly fee for a single employee and nothing else.
A big record company will have a lot lot more than 1M streams.
1 Like
Yeah, in fact, as it handily came up on my twitter recently, I was able to verify that da TURKIZH DONGAH has had 13M streams this year.
1 Like
Oh. Through Spotify alone?
Yup.
Oh, and also - the $5/1k youāre talking about is what the MUSICIAN is paid, isnāt it? Not the whole record company?
No, I imagine thatās what the record company gets (and then what % of that goes to the artist will be something set out in the contract between them) Iām basing my stats on my memory of what rates I get for stuff I originally self-released.
I should also add that I suspect there is variance on streams pay rate depending on how much of the stream is completed.
Anyway I just logged into my pay (lol) records and another 5c earnt for 18 streams
Letās just jerk off on cam, more economically viable