So, Pogo Mofo wants to get some instruction in the art of taming da beast we call da 88.
Some Russian/Georgian chick in BK, New York who got her Masters/PHD (not sure) in Florida along with Asiya Korepanova (her Mazeppa from the Tchaik Comp’s on da tube) charges $100 per lesson.
Problem: Da Pogo mofo is low on fundage.
I’m not attached to her, in particular…any properly trained (preferably Russian school) mofo/ette would do.
Is a lesson every other week benefizheeyat or just zheeyat?
Da Pogo mofo has decided to learn da Pedozenen by da Shoe. Tiz technically doable and musically satisfin’. Along wiz that, he vill work on Moszkowski sheeyatsu fo development of dexter88ity.
First two vas easy to sight-rape but as he vaz zight rapin’ he noticed many voices in da first sheeyatsu. Really beautiful baseline in da Foreign Lands and Mofos.
I’m 299 and 740 are great for working your tech, but can’t deez zheeyats be condensed to like 8 measures of a specific technical problem so a mofo don’t need to spend unnecessary time with memorizing diz musical drivel
So much of what out there is for pros hard to say what’s useful for people playing for enjoyment. I’d like to see an engineer and somebody into anatomy and physiology tackle tech problems and put some data behind outcomes from regimen recommendations.
I’d probably get more from learning each of the relatively short Kinderszenen or a movement in a Mozart Zon and playing them at tempo very well, then trying to perfect 8 measures a day of some dull, demotivating Czerny sheeyatsu that’s good for developing dex and velocity.
All of these tech sheeyats are worth drilling if you’re already talented. It’s like a basketball player that does all of these dribbling drills that are only useful to him because he’s already good at dribbling and just wants to maximize his ability.
Agree I didn’t realize I wasn’t sensing beats right or articulating much at all when noodling around until I tried messing with the bach inventions again.
There’s a service/website called Practicing the Piano by Graham Fitch. He actually really prefers the Moszkowski Op. 91 over Czerny because Moszkowski’s (as he says) etudes come from the modern school of piano playing. I assume he means it’s more applicable to stuff composed my Mendy/Chopin era and after.
Like I started the Moszkowski Op. 91 No. 1 yesterday and on the surface it seems like there’s just a mirrored finger independence pattern but (performance notes pointed out) there is a melody threaded through the 1 and 3rd 16th note in every 4 1/16th note grouping. That makes working on technique more interesting because you are trying to bring a melody out while doing work on finger indep./equalization.
My pianist friend actually thinks 2 voice polyphony is more difficult than 3 because nothing is hidden (I assume she’s is referring to what you’re saying re: rhythm, articulation, phrasing)