Hey, donāt shit on janitors. Andrei Platonov worked as a janitor at the end of his life and he was a genius.
As Propagandhi sing, āā¦better lives have been lived in the margins,
locked in the prisons and lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in palaces.ā
Yes, I almost figured if the Wang was from Alex. It will be a million years before I get round to writing, but please give me a heads up if he shows up again here some day.
Itās not that I donāt trust the list incidentally but itās often really difficult to find good copies of MAHās recordings today unless you know where they come from, since he was so popular with us kids in the late 90s and 00s who traded things on LP MiniDiscs or low quality Mp3s which could be sent over the internet, recorded 8 kbps webcasts in lack of FM/DAB/Sat equipment, did iPod conversions etc, and were real rascals in general when it came to quality and long-term thinking. Surely not all of it, but what made me a bit suspicious here was that I saw that some of the concerts listed have missing tracks or are listed out of order, indicating files as source rather than the CDs heās marked them as (which maybe is how he archives them). Itās not only limited to early digital tech and MAH for that matter - in the analogue era there was the issue with poor FM reception and all speed copying over poor cassette decks instead, and because of all deteriorating CD-Rs, American open-reel tapes etc even recordings which once were well made and well preserved arenāt necessarily anymore today.
The Kapell would be appealing (even in the Rhapsody), but it seems they have singled it out from being available in any way? I wonder whatās up with that.
Half-kidding, I wonder if there is anything in the Stokie archives that are out there, to whatever extent they exist. He seems like he would have been into bootlegging recordings.
All I know about that is that one of my earliest friends in the piano world, Paul Hoeffler, was instrumental in seeing to that Stokowski got recorded for many decades, and I have a vague recollection of that they knew each other personally too. Iād hence guess that any authorized Stokowski bootlegs would have been from his gang, and that this is what forms the archive (hence nothing previously unknown).
That is shocking. It means this new Rach was available there already for eight years? I wonder what da Ainley thinks of this and why it took so long.
Somebody needs to do a serious investigation into the private collections of great 20th Century musicians that were donated to universities. Who knows what treasures are still out there, rotting away, with only restricted access for the public.
Wow, unbelievableā¦Iāll research about that Jap. collector.
About the Rach Symf Dances, da Ainley replied to me:
'Marston emailed their customers the other day with this statement: āFor over ten years we have been working on a very significant piano discovery: a private recording of Rachmaninoff at the piano demonstrating just how he wanted his new orchestral work, Symphonic Dances, to be performed. While this project was of great importance, progress was painfully slow and its release even seemed questionable. Certain circumstances changed a year or so ago, making this project a possibility, but recently we were thrown a major curveball. A copy of the recording was leaked and was out in the public. We feared this recording would be all over the Internet in inferior form and out of our hands. While we had many pieces in place, we had to drop everything and finish this project in relative silence, as logic dictated.ā
Once something has been donated somewhere, the bureaucracy can be pretty prohibitive, so I imagine with this there was quite a lot they have to circumventā¦
And yes, one wonders what other treasures are languishing in official and private archives. Thank goodness this is now becoming available - it is really quite beyond descriptionā¦ļ»æā
I know weāve been through this already, but really - wouldnāt that have been the best solution? Itās of a musician who died decades ago, it has no intrinsic commercial tie, and it is of great public interest. That of course makes it a dream target for a company like this to seize, but with the platform that exist through the internet today thereās exactly zero reason why people should have to go through a Marston paywall to hear it. Thanks to that they got their claws in it it will now be bought by a couple of hundreds, rather than streamed by millions if it had been made freely available - as I think should have been the goal when it was discovered rather than try to make money off of it like this. They make it sound like some major catastrophe was narrowly avoided by keeping the recording away from the public, but the only blow it would have dealt had it leaked would have been to their check book.
I also note for what itās worth that itās released in a 3-CD set where each disc costs less than a dollar for them to add, but triple the price for the consumer. Remember, the recordings on here are in public domain - theyāre not licensing them or paying anything to release them. Marston is of course a hugely important company for people with our interest and I donāt deny them the possibility of running their business, but they are important because of their complete Godowsky set, the Sauer release etc where significant time and effort is involved to collect, transfer and research the material in question. Monetizing and copyright claiming new discoveries like this however is working against the music world rather than for it, and I really think it needs to be recognized as such.
EXACTLY. I love Marston and I bought several of their CDs, but I wonāt purchase this set. Iāll just wait until somebody shares it here or somewhere else.