well ofcourse tiz incomparable.
da mozart is one of the greatest geniuses of all time. but still Debussy is a great composer also and because of his impressionistic nature in music its obvious that there is not so much personal and intimated feeling about it tho its very close to soul at some points. so lets this thread iz lame and let it be ovah
I think that Debussy is FAR superior to Mozart in some instances and that Mozart is better than Debussy at some points. Debussys music does often have a much more emotional effect on ME than Mozarts music because of his much richer harmonies. But I am only stating my oppinion.
This on the other hand is not just my oppinion:
It is NOT a fact that Mozart is a better composer than Debussy.
I do also remember seeing a signature by you going something like this: I am strictly against comparing in art/music.
That was Vlad. Alas, he was one of the few pianists who indeed compared alot of sheeyat. the harshest composer he ever made a comparison was Mahler. âOne Chopin piece is worth Mahlerâs whole compositionâ. For some reason, I agree with uncle Vlad. Mahler is one of the sheeyatest composers who ever walked on this planet.
he canât compose without putting loud drumming/percussion in between 2 seconds. Itâs like he need that to keep the beat.
For a great composer, percussion is merely embellishment, and the structural and contraceptual ideas and the âstruggleâ between tension and resolution should be enough to achieve climax and other dramatic effects.